Uncertainty Resolution in Misinformation Detection

hci
Large Language Models (LLMs) help combat misinformation but struggle with ambiguous statements. New framework improves context assessment.
Authors

Yury Orlovskiy

Camille Thibault

Anne Imouza

Jean-François Godbout

Reihaneh Rabbany

Kellin Pelrine

Published

January 2, 2024

Summary: Uncertainty Resolution in Misinformation Detection

Main Findings

  1. Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 are effective in mitigating misinformation in well-contextualized statements but struggle with assessing ambiguous or context-deficient statements.
  2. A new framework for resolving uncertainty in misleading statements was introduced, resulting in a significant improvement in answerability by 38 percentage points and classification performance by over 10 percentage points macro F1.
  3. The introduced framework provides a valuable component for future misinformation mitigation pipelines, showcasing promise for enhancing tools in handling ambiguous or incomplete context in statements.

Introduction

  • Misinformation in digital content presents societal challenges, necessitating reliable tools for identification and mitigation.
  • Interest in utilizing advanced LLMs like GPT-4 for misinformation detection has grown, but these models struggle with context-deficient statements.

Data

  • The LIAR-New dataset, with human-annotated labels, was utilized for experiments, focusing on hard and impossible statements for the evaluation.

Methodology

  • The study introduced a comprehensive framework for categorizing missing information and developed guidelines for user queries to resolve uncertainty in ambiguous statements.
  • A Category-based QA approach demonstrated substantial improvements in veracity evaluation and uncertainty resolution compared to generic approaches.

Experiments

  • The 2 LLM approach with user questions based on categories of missing information was found to be the most effective approach, leading to substantial improvements in veracity evaluation and uncertainty resolution.

Conclusion

  • The study introduced a framework for classifying missing information, significantly enhancing GPT-4’s performance and providing a method to build more comprehensive misinformation mitigation approaches.

Critique

  • Some readers may find the detailed technical methodology and data analysis overwhelming and challenging to follow.
  • The study focused on the LIAR-New dataset, and generalizing the findings to other datasets may require further validation.

Appendix

Model gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
Date Generated 2024-02-26
Abstract http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01197v1
HTML https://browse.arxiv.org/html/2401.01197v1
Truncated False
Word Count 7771