Large Language Models are Geographically Biased
social-sciences
education
LLMs carry biases from training data, leading to geographic biases and systemic errors.
Summary:
- Large Language Models (LLMs) inherently carry the biases contained in their training corpora, which can lead to the perpetuation of societal harm.
- The study proposes to understand what LLMs know about the world through the lens of geography, particularly focusing on geospatial predictions.
- The study demonstrates that LLMs are capable of making accurate zero-shot geospatial predictions and exhibit common biases across a range of objective and subjective topics.
Major Findings:
- LLMs are capable of making very accurate zero-shot geospatial predictions, showing strong monotonic correlation with ground truth.
- LLMs exhibit geographic biases across a range of both objective and subjective topics, particularly biased against areas with lower socioeconomic conditions.
- All LLMs are likely biased to some degree, with significant variation in the magnitude of bias across existing LLMs.
Analysis and Critique:
- The study provides valuable insights into the biases present in LLMs, particularly in the context of geospatial predictions.
- The findings highlight the need for further research and development to mitigate biases in LLMs, especially in sensitive subjective topics.
- The study’s focus on geographic bias adds a new dimension to the understanding of biases in LLMs, contributing to the broader conversation on fairness and accuracy in language models.
Appendix
Model | gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 |
Date Generated | 2024-02-26 |
Abstract | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02680v1 |
HTML | https://browse.arxiv.org/html/2402.02680v1 |
Truncated | False |
Word Count | 15193 |